Am Mittwoch, 3. August 2011, um 05:43:32 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber: > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 12:35 +0200, Nino Novak wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 2. August 2011, um 11:14:22 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber: > > > David, > > > I'll respond to the rest of your note later, but for now I want > > > to > > > > > > address just one item: > > > > > We can then copy those files into the Drafts spaces, update > > > > > them, and save them under different names -- to avoid > > > > > confusion and to enable us to put them on wiki along with > > > > > the 3.3.x files. For example, 0101GS34-ChapterTitle.odt > > > > > instead of > > > > > 0101GS3-ChapterTitle.odt. > > > > > > > > I'd love to get the versioning info out of the file name and > > > > into the document's meta data, so that - for instance - > > > > "0101GS34-ChapterTitle.odt" would become "ChapterTitle.odt" and > > > > that doc's meta data contains all the info we want to store > > > > about that doc. > > > > > > AFAIK, unless the filenames are different between the 3.3.x and > > > 3.4.x versions of a chapter, they cannot both be stored on the > > > wiki. > > > > Sorry my ignorance, but ... what exactly was the rationale of > > storing the files in the wiki? > > > > Couldn't you/we keep the files in Alfresco and just linking them > > from the wiki? So the problem of identical filenames should be > > solvable. > > David would know, but I don't think that would work. At the moment > you need a login to get to files on Alfresco, so I would think a > link from the wiki would fail.
There should be a fixed (dedicated) location for externally visible documents of course. Alfresco is a content management system, so I'm sure it allows such a setup. > Also, the location of files on Alfresco occasionally changes, so the > links could get mucked up. Of course it has to be made sure that the links work properly, but that's true for all (external) links, that they have to be kept actual - all the time. So the names have to be chosen carefully, and maybe some kind of automated link check could be implemented. > At this time we are not storing the PDFs on Alfresco, but that could > change. > > There is some merit in not keeping two copies of the published > chapters (one on Alfresco and one on the wiki), so your suggestion > could be useful if it's technically feasible. Yes, avoiding duplication and allowing identical names for different documents was the main reason for this suggestion. But however - it's just a suggestion, which we have to consider the pros and cons of. Nino -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
