On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 23:26 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > Hi :) > I thought it was on the wiki too. I haven't explored much.
I've now added my proposals for both GS and WG to the wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Proposal_Revise_Getting_Started http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Proposal_Revise_Writer_Guide > Ch1 seems to be a merging and of the current CH1&2 into a more logical order? > No, current Ch2 was moved to end of book. > I think the Math chapter has been absorbed into other chapters. No, Math chapter is proposed for removal because we have the Math Guide. > Base and Macros > removed. But there is a lot more in the detail so i think it's better if i > have > a closer look later before discussing it in the list. Good idea. ;-) Also comparing it to the existing ToC makes it easier to see what's removed and what is rearranged. --Jean > I liked the flow of the proposed Ch1 > Regards from > Tom :) > > ________________________________ > From: Jean Hollis Weber <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Sat, 13 August, 2011 22:24:23 > Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GS Macro Chapter New Version Ready > but.... > > On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 13:54 +0100, Tom Davies wrote: > > Hi :) > > I thought the GS Guide was going to keep a chapter on Macros but a separate > >book > > > > was going to appear later to expand on that. Just like Writer and the apps > >have > > > > their own books but also have a chapter in the GS Guide? I think there > > already > > > > is an excellent guide written by Andrew and i would like us to link to it > > while > > > > making it clear that it is a third party book rather than one produced by > > the > > docs team here. > > Yes, a link to Andrew's book should definitely be added. It was in the > OOo GS book (in Chapter 1, where other sources of info are listed under > "How to Get Help"), but apparently it was removed at some point from the > LibO GS chapter before publication. > > As for whether to retain the Macros chapter in GS, most people who spoke > up said they wanted it kept there, so I guess we're keeping it. > > > > I still haven't looked at the re-organising that Jean has suggested but i > > suspect that the re-organising would be a good thing to do. There are > > probably > > > > tiny inconsequential issues that i might end-up arguing about until i look > > at > > those issues in-depth. What do other people think of the propsed changes? > > Is > > > there an easy link to a list of proposals? > > I thought I had put it on the LibO wiki, but I can't find it. I'll add > it to the wiki when I have time, but meanwhile you can read the OOo > version here (I had made the same proposal to both groups): > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Dashboard/Proposal_Revise_Getting_Started > > > --Jean -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
