On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 22:15, Martin Fox <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:47:15 +0100 (BST)
> Tom Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi :)
>> I thought ODFauthors were trying to organise collaboration between OOo
>> and LO documentation?  I don't think this should be 1 person's
>> responsibility to organise.  I think there are a few people here from
>> ODFauthors now?
>
> Hi Tom
> Any subject line involving both AOOo and LibO should probably be prefaced
> with a "Here be Dragons".
>
> As Jean likes to put it, managing the authors group to date has been like
> herding cats.
>
> On the AOOo lists discussions get quickly into personal slanging matches
> and much airing  of dirty linen. That aside, the subject of documentation
> is - if I read the lists correctly - nowhere near as important as getting
> a build of AOOo done and sorting out the integration of OOo into the
> Apache farmyard. Maybe I am not 100% correct but.....
>
> So herding of cats on AOOo would be something to dream of (Nobody expects
> the S.I. etc...... apologies to MP).
>
> My impression at present is that we (?) are better served by continuing to
> review and revise docs for LibO - including a peep at 3.5 - and (where
> appropriate) sneak a look for differences at the _old_ OOo 3.4Beta which
> was released just before the Oracle "Dump".
>

I agree with Martin's assessment of the situation. I think most of the
active people from ODFAuthors are now working on LO anyway. Dan Lewis
is an exception, and I don't know what Jared Kobos's plans are. Not
sure who else is still around; in mid-September, after most people
have finished their holidays, perhaps we'll have a better idea of the
situation.

--Jean

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to