On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 06:47 +1000, Jean Weber wrote:
> On 11/01/2012, at 22:13, Tom Davies <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dan :)
> > Normally we wouldn't do this but would it be good to upload those
> > incomplete chapters or works-in-progress to the wiki?
> > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Documentation/Publications
> > Updates could always be uploaded to replace them later?
> > Regards from
> > Tom :)
>
>
> Could also (or instead) put them on the ODFAuthors website.
>
> I have no objection to putting the Base Guide drafts on the wiki, but I
> suggest not on the same page as the officially published docs -- unless
> clearly marked as DRAFTs.
>
> I've seen a lot of confusion (and accusations of poor quality) from people
> who get hold of user guide drafts thinking they are finished documents. They
> get passed around from one user to another and not everyone realises there
> might be a more up to date version or where to get it. Of course, some of our
> "finished" docs are a bit rougher than we'd prefer, but that's a separate
> problem.
>
> Jean
Then again the drafts can be clearly marked as drafts using a
watermark? Just a thought.
Then again, chapters 2-4 are written for OOo and need some
modifications before they will be ready for LO "use".
I going to think about this during the evening and annouce what I
will be doing in the "morning" (by 1400 UTC).
--Dan
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
