Hi :)
>From what Andreas says the whole of Base would benefit hugely from being 
>pruned right back to about OOo's 2.0 or earlier.  Andreas' idea sounds too 
>radical but i think Dan is onto something here.  

Most of the problems seem to be about the embedded version of HSqlDb which is 
horribly ancient and apparently is anyway tweaked past breaking point.  HSqlDb 
is one of the few things left that forces dependence on java.  

Forcing people to use an external back-end would make Base far less like MS 
Access but it would cut right back on the problems people raise on the Users 
List with regards to Base.  

I kinda agree with Mark, that it would further marginalise something that is 
already almost entirely unknown but i think it would be worth it, to get back 
to a good starting point that could be built from.  
Regards from
Tom :)  


--- On Mon, 25/6/12, Dan <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Dan <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Ping Dan Lewis: GS with Base 3.5?
To: [email protected]
Date: Monday, 25 June, 2012, 15:05

Mark Stanton wrote:
> I think that that would be an extremely bad idea.
> Why take something that's currently still really marginal and then
> marginalise it even further?
> 
> Mark Stanton
> One small step for mankind...
     Perhaps because it would not make it any worse than it is now. The changes 
I propose are to do what is already done when connecting to a database using 
HSQLDB 2.8: have the database files in a separate selected folder instead of 
the .odb file. Forms, queries, and reports would remain in it. Most of the 
necessary code already exists.
     When creating a new database, a person would see very little difference 
from now. Create new database would be selected as now. An additional step 
having the person select the folder to keep the database files or create the 
folder. Then the third step would be the same: register the database, select 
the name for the .odb file, and where to save it. The .odb will contain the 
location of the database files as now.
     It would require another wizard to convert the embedded databases to the 
new system. It would move the database folder of the .odb file to a selected 
location renaming the database folder to the person's choosing. The new 
location for the files would be written in the .odb files as is done presently 
when connecting to an external data source.

--Dan



-- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected]
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Reply via email to