Hi :) Ahhh, that makes a lot of sense to me. Kieran?
I suspect that those are not 100% rigid though and that a reviewer might make proof-reading changes if that clarified something and a proof-reader might suddenly gain an understanding and see a simpler way of describing something but that it's best to try to stick within the role as far as possible to avoid getting bogged down in the task? Regards from Tom :) >________________________________ > From: Hazel Russman <[email protected]> > ><snip /> > >A reviewer needs technical knowledge; a proofreader needs linguistic >fluency. > >-- >H Russman > > -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [email protected] Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
