Dear Dave, I am sorry to have caused problems. I've even compared the original and corrected document, did not see any differences. Since LO does not compare everything, this may be the reason why I did not notice.
I do not know how did this happen. There is, however, a very simple way how to correct the page references: open a file and insert arbitrary page reference to heading anywhere - in that moment all incorrect references change to correct values (looks to be a kind o magic). Then delete the just inserted reference. So, it is not necessary to manually incorporate Hazel's correction into the old files again. This would be a lot of work, and my work will be lost, too. I can, for course, do that by myself, if you agree. I have to find the reason. I've been using the script for about a year, but the problem started to appear only recently. Sorry for causing problems again best regards Milos On 2014-10-22 22:05, Dave Barton wrote: > Hazel Russman wrote: > > 8<-- snip -->8 > >> Nothing needs to be redone. All that is needed is to use LO's >> built-in merge facility to merge the published version with the two >> corrected versions. It will flag up all changes and you can decide >> which ones to incorporate. > > It appears that we have a bigger problem. I have just started working to > review/merge your corrections into the "cleaned XML" files provided by > Milos and I am finding that the "cleaning" process has created many > errors, especially in cross-references. > Just one of numerous examples: WG4201 - In the originally published file > and Hazel's revision the cross-references on Page 23 to page 24 are > correct. In the "cleaned" file these cross-references erroneously point > to page 26. > > Since I was responsible for replacing the originally published files > with the "cleaned" files on the wiki and ODFAuthors, without checking > for these kinds of issues first, I will: > a) Revert the files I replaced to the originally published files. > b) Review/merge your corrections with the originally published files. > c) Publish the corrected files. > > I think it is more important to have accurate documentation than it is > to worry about minor XML inaccuracies. > > Sorry to have been part of the problem while trying to be part of the > solution. > > Dave > > -- Milos Sramek, msrame...@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: documentation+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
