Thanks Olivier, that's fine.

I've put a useless test comment on the ACOS page. We'd better remember to initial our comments so that Ronnie knows who has raised each one.

Regards,

Steve


------ Original Message ------
From: "Olivier Hallot" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: 02/09/2020 19:41:23
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] Please give your feedback for this document edit

Hi Steve

Each wiki page has (after login) a discussion tab on the top left.

It appeared to me a good place to add comments on the page being edited,
about the technicalities...

Olivier



Em 02/09/2020 10:20, Steve (GMail) escreveu:
 Hi Ronnie and Olivier,

 During our Monday meeting, I think it was suggested that we could record
 comments within the wiki itself (rather than via email). Is that so and
 what's the best way to do this?

 Regards,

 Steve


 ------ Original Message ------
 From: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]>
 To: "Steve (GMail)" <[email protected]>
 Cc: "Documentation Team" <[email protected]>
 Sent: 02/09/2020 13:40:41
 Subject: Re: Re[4]: [libreoffice-documentation] Please give your
 feedback for this document edit

 Hello Steve,

 Done!
 I don't think there's any need to change the wording throughout to
 reflect the name "arccosine". I just thought it would be worth
 mentioning in the Summary sub-section that "inverse trigonometric
 cosine" and "arccosine", and maybe even "arccos", are just different
 names for the same thing.

 I have written the code and generating new ones will take a few
 minutes only, it just a matter of choice also I have moved them to
 additional section.
 With regards to the GIF, I'm quite happy with the animated version. My
 motivation for raising the comment was a concern that there might be
 more effort involved for you to create the animated GIF compared to the
 static equivalent. As long as it isn't too onerous for you, that's fine.

 I think opening in a new tab is better but as far as I know we need to
 make that adjustment on Admin Home -> Editing and Plugins, General
 Settings Tab, "External links and images" section. Which will open all
 external links in the new window.
 One further general point for discussion, the link to ODF standard
 currently takes the user off our wiki. Should we consider opening the
 ODF page in a new browser window?

 I'm looking forward to reviewing some more.
 I will send some more pages soon.

 Regards,

 Steve



 ------ Original Message ------
 From: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]>
 To: "Steve (GMail)" <[email protected]>
 Cc: "Documentation Team" <[email protected]>
 Sent: 02/09/2020 12:14:51
 Subject: Re: Re[2]: [libreoffice-documentation] Please give your
 feedback for this document edit

 >Hello Steve,
 >
 >  Thanks for your comments.
 >>As Olivier commented, this update is what we hoped for.
 >>
 >>A few further comments for you to consider:
 >>
 >
 >>SUMMARY SUB-SECTION
 >Thats a good suggestion.Done!
 >>1.    Should the summary state that this function calculates the
 >>“principal value”, which is an accepted term I believe.
 >
 >If we see Microsoft's description they have used arccosine everywhere
 >should we also shift to it. I actually continued what already exists
 >but we can consider. What do you say?
 >>2.    Similarly, would it be worth mentioning “arc cosine” as well as
 >>“inverse trigonometric cosine”.
 >>
 >
 >>ARGUMENTS SUB-SECTION
 >Done!
 >>1.    Since the Syntax sub-section gives the argument name as Number,
 >>I
 >>would suggest that the singular form is used in this subsection too.
 >>2.    A very minor point, but is it worth putting a plus sign before
 >>“1”?
 >>3.    I would be wary about using the acronym NaN which may not be
 >>familiar to some of our users. Perhaps replace with the more specific
 >>“an invalid numeric value (#NUM!) error”.
 >Actually I should apologise as I somehow skipped this line and actually
 >it doesn't make any sense to me as well. Actually I found that this
 >line is coming from the description section of this
 
>https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Math/acos#:~:text=acos()%20method%20returns%20a,Math%20is%20not%20a%20constructor).

 >webpage but it makes little sense for our users here to be added hence
 >I  have removed it.
 >>4.    Apologies but I do not know what the last sentence really means
 >>(“Because ACOS is a static method of Math, you always use it as
 >>Math”).
 >>
 >Thanks
 >>EXAMPLES SUB-SECTION
 >>1.    I think the format looks great.
 >Done
 >>2.    In description for third and fourth examples, radian and degree
 >>should both be plural.
 >>3.    In description for fourth example, insert “by” before 180/PI().
 >>4.    In description for fifth example, again I would not bother with
 >>the NaN acronym. So maybe change “error (NaN)” to “an error”. Also I
 >>suspect you could safely delete “which is between -1 and 1” as it is
 >>already been stated.
 >
 >About this as I earlier mentioned we don't aim at creating such gifs
 >for all purposes but it will be fine for some trigonometric and
 >statistical the distributions ones. Otherwise if you see I have edited
 >ABS function as well but I didn't care about adding a gif or even an
 >image there. Also Olivier seem to like this one here.
 >>5.    A point for discussion – is the dynamic GIF appropriate for
 >>functions like this or is animation unnecessary for such a simple
 >>function? Would a static GIF convey the necessary information
 >>adequately?
 >>6.    Another point for discussion – as the GIF covers the whole of
 >>the
 >>function and isn’t really an example, would it be more appropriately
 >>placed in the Additional details sub-section?
 >>
 >It did. Thanks
 >>I hope these thoughts help. And please keep up the good work!
 >>
 >One thing I would like to add is that this was the first one hence I
 >took reviews to avoid getting in a situation where I am working 4-5
 >days with different minds but now since we are on the right track as we
 >discussed in the meeting I'll send 20-30 function pages for review in
 >the weekend of your convenience.
 >
 >Regards,
 >Ronnie
 --
 To unsubscribe e-mail to:
[email protected]
 <mailto:documentation%[email protected]>
 Problems?
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
 Posting guidelines + more:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
 Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

--
Olivier Hallot
LibreOffice Documentation Coordinator
Comunidade LibreOffice
Rio de Janeiro - Brasil - Local Time: UTC-03:00
http://tdf.io/joinus

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Reply via email to