Hello Steve and Olivier,

Along with GETPIVOTDATA HLOOKUP's help also has no example section.

Regards,
Ronnie Gandhi
Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
+91-07874243430


On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 4:12 PM Steve Fanning <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hello Olivier and Ronnie,
>
> Thanks for that information. I have made a note on our list of help
> issues that the description for the GETPIVOTDATA() function does not
> currently include an example of its usage.
>
> Regards,
>
> Steve
>
>
> On 23/11/2020 09:21, Olivier Hallot wrote:
> > Hi Ronnie
> > Pick the example in the Help pages. All is there.
> >
> >
> https://help.libreoffice.org/7.1/en-US/text/scalc/guide/datapilot_createtable.html?DbPAR=CALC#bm_id3148491
> >
> > Regards
> > Olivier
> >
> > Em 23/11/2020 03:48, GANDHI RONNIE escreveu:
> >> Hello Steve and Olivier,
> >>
> >> GETPIVOTDATA function seems to be an important one but there are no
> >> examples for it on the help page.
> >>
> >> I'll add some on the wiki pages though.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ronnie Gandhi
> >> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >> +91-07874243430
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 4:39 PM Steve Fanning
> >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>      Thanks Ronnie.
> >>
> >>      I'm not even sure the statement is 100% correct if you look across
> the
> >>      full set of Calc functions. For example, in the case of DCOUNT(),
> you
> >>      may omit a value for the 2nd argument but must include a value for
> the
> >>      3rd argument.
> >>
> >>      I'll give some thought as to how to handle these statements in the
> Help.
> >>
> >>      For the wiki, please omit the statements for now.
> >>
> >>      Regards,
> >>
> >>      Steve
> >>
> >>
> >>      On 10/11/2020 10:43, GANDHI RONNIE wrote:
> >>      > Hello Steve and Olivier,
> >>      >
> >>      > I found one more useless text in the FV function.
> >>      >
> >>      > "In the LibreOfficeDev Calc functions, parameters marked as
> >>      "optional" can
> >>      > be left out only when no parameter follows. For example, in a
> >>      function with
> >>      > four parameters, where the last two parameters are marked as
> >>      "optional",
> >>      > you can leave out parameter 4 or parameters 3 and 4, but you
> >>      cannot leave
> >>      > out parameter 3 alone."
> >>      >
> >>      > Either we add this in all functions with optional parameters
> which
> >>      I think
> >>      > is not possible or we remove it from here.
> >>      >
> >>      > What do you guys think?
> >>      >
> >>      > Regards,
> >>      > Ronnie Gandhi
> >>      > Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>      > Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>      > +91-07874243430
> >>      >
> >>      >
> >>      > On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 2:17 PM GANDHI RONNIE
> >>      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>      >
> >>      >> Hello Steve and Olivier,
> >>      >>
> >>      >> I found another error in the help pages.
> >>      >>
> >>      >> For the DURATION function, there is a pinpoint which is not
> needed I
> >>      >> believe.
> >>      >>
> >>      >> *The functions whose names end with _ADD or _EXCEL2003 return
> the
> >>      same
> >>      >> results as the corresponding Microsoft Excel 2003 functions
> >>      without the
> >>      >> suffix. Use the functions without suffix to get results based on
> >>      >> international standards.*
> >>      >>
> >>      >> Do look into it and see if you find it useless as well.
> >>      >>
> >>      >> Regards,
> >>      >> Ronnie Gandhi
> >>      >> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>      >> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>      >> +91-07874243430
> >>      >>
> >>      >>
> >>      >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 2:08 AM Steve (GMail)
> >>      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >> wrote:
> >>      >>
> >>      >>> Ronnie / Olivier,
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> As promised I have created an initial list of issues with the
> >>      help files
> >>      >>> that have been noticed so far during the GSOD2020 Functions
> Wiki
> >>      work.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> This list can be found in the GSOD2020/WIKI folder in
> NextCloud,
> >>      file
> >>      >>> name "Help pages - problems noticed during GSOD20.odt". We can
> >>      discuss
> >>      >>> these during our weekly Tuesday meetings as required.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Ronnie, please have a quick look and see if I've missed any of
> >>      the issues
> >>      >>> that you have raised so far. If you spot any more, please carry
> >>      on emailing
> >>      >>> them to us. I can do a quick filter / check before adding the
> >>      issue to the
> >>      >>> list.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Regards,
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Steve
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>      >>> From: "Steve (GMail)" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> To: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> Cc: "Olivier Hallot" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>; "Documentation
> >>      >>> Team" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> Sent: 25/10/2020 13:57:15
> >>      >>> Subject: Re[4]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 -
> Possible
> >>      Error in
> >>      >>> Help pages
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Hi Ronnie,
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> With regards to the MINIFS problem, I agree with you. I propose
> >>      to keep a
> >>      >>> list of these minor changes to the help that are identified
> >>      during the
> >>      >>> GSOD20 work and will discuss with Olivier how best to fix them.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> You are also correct about the POISSON.DIST problem. This will
> >>      be added
> >>      >>> to the list above. However, in this case, there is a slightly
> more
> >>      >>> significant issue - the Function Wizard contains text which
> >>      indicates that
> >>      >>> the parameter is optional when, in fact, it is required. I will
> >>      raise a bug
> >>      >>> report on this.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Regards,
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Steve
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>      >>> From: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> To: "Steve (GMail)" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> Cc: "Olivier Hallot" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>; "Documentation
> >>      >>> Team" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> Sent: 25/10/2020 10:46:58
> >>      >>> Subject: Re: Re[2]: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 -
> Possible
> >>      >>> Error in Help pages
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Hello Steve and Olivier,
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> I have found some more errors in help pages:
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> For MINIFS
> >>      >>>
> >>      <
> https://help.libreoffice.org/7.1/en-US/text/scalc/01/func_minifs.html?&DbPAR=CALC&System=UNIX
> >
> >>      the
> >>      >>> 2nd example in "Using regular expressions and nested functions"
> >>      section the
> >>      >>> regex is about "book" but description states "pen".
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Also in POISSON.DIST
> >>      >>>
> >>      <
> https://help.libreoffice.org/7.1/en-US/text/scalc/01/04060184.html?DbPAR=CALC#bm_id2953985
> >
> >>      the
> >>      >>> function says "C" parameter is optional but that is not true. I
> >>      tried it in
> >>      >>> Calc.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Please look into the above.
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> Regards,
> >>      >>> Ronnie Gandhi
> >>      >>> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>      >>> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>      >>> +91-07874243430
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 8:09 PM Steve (GMail)
> >>      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>> wrote:
> >>      >>>
> >>      >>>> Ronnie / Olivier,
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Section 6.18.37 in the Open Document Format for Office
> Applications
> >>      >>>> (OpenDocument) Version 1.2 contains the following statement:
> >>      “cumulative is
> >>      >>>> a Logical parameter … If omitted, FALSE() is assumed.”.
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> The 7.1 Help description of this function states that “The
> >>      cumulative
> >>      >>>> distribution function is the default if no value is specified
> >>      for this
> >>      >>>> parameter”. It also states that if cumulative is set to
> >>      anything other than
> >>      >>>> FALSE or 0, then you get the cumulative distribution function.
> >>      Therefore,
> >>      >>>> there is a discrepancy between the Help description and the
> ODF.
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Moving on to the software, the following fragment of a
> spreadsheet
> >>      >>>> demonstrates its behaviour. (Note: image wont be visible via
> >>      mailing list)
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> This shows that the software is defaulting cumulative to 0, in
> >>      >>>> accordance with the ODF.
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Consequently, it looks to me as if the help page is wrong in
> this
> >>      >>>> respect. It should be changed to say that the default is the
> >>      probability
> >>      >>>> density function.
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Olivier, if you agree, would you like me to make the change
> via
> >>      Gerrit?
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Regards,
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Steve
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>      >>>> From: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>> To: "Steve (GMail)" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>> Cc: "Documentation Team" <
> [email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>> Sent: 18/10/2020 17:20:43
> >>      >>>> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible
> >>      Error in
> >>      >>>> Help pages
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Hello Steve and Olivier,
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> I found one more erroneous function in help pages.
> HYPEGEOMDIST's
> >>      >>>> description of *cumulative *parameter's last statement is
> wrong. It
> >>      >>>> states "The cumulative distribution function is the default if
> >>      no value is
> >>      >>>> specified for this parameter." but I tested and by default
> >>      probability
> >>      >>>> density function is considered. So changes should be
> incorporated
> >>      >>>> accordingly.
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> Regards,
> >>      >>>> Ronnie Gandhi
> >>      >>>> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>      >>>> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>      >>>> +91-07874243430
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2020 at 1:58 PM Steve (GMail)
> >>      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>> wrote:
> >>      >>>>
> >>      >>>>> Hi Ronnie,
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>> I agree that the Help page for these two functions could be
> >>      improved.
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>> I will raise a bug in our Bugzilla system so that the issue
> can be
> >>      >>>>> progressed.
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>> Regards,
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>> Steve
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>> ------ Original Message ------
> >>      >>>>> From: "GANDHI RONNIE" <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>>> To: [email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>; "Documentation Team"
> >>      >>>>> <[email protected]
> >>      <mailto:[email protected]>>
> >>      >>>>> Sent: 04/10/2020 19:05:41
> >>      >>>>> Subject: [libreoffice-documentation] GSOD 2020 - Possible
> >>      Error in Help
> >>      >>>>> pages
> >>      >>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> Hello Olivier and Steve,
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> I could sense an error on the help pages for BETA.INV and
> BETAINV
> >>      >>>>> function.
> >>      >>>>>> The definition of Number is wrong. It states Number to be
> between
> >>      >>>>> Start and
> >>      >>>>>> End but actually it is the probability which is associated
> >>      with BETA
> >>      >>>>>> function for other given arguments and the output will be
> >>      that Number.
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> Compare it with MS excel equivalent
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>
> >>
> https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/beta-inv-function-e84cb8aa-8df0-4cf6-9892-83a341d252eb
> >>      >>>>>> .
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> Actually out function works the same way but the description
> >>      of this
> >>      >>>>> Number
> >>      >>>>>> is wrong.
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> One eg to prove the point is : =BETA.INV(0.5,3,4,3,4) gives
> >>      >>>>> 3.42140719069071
> >>      >>>>>> But =BETA.INV(3.5,3,4,3,4) gives Err:502 which infact
> >>      qualifies the
> >>      >>>>>> definition.
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> Ronnie Gandhi
> >>      >>>>>> Undergraduate at Computer Science and Engineering
> >>      >>>>>> Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee
> >>      >>>>>> +91-07874243430
> >>      >>>>>>
> >>      >>>>>> --
> >>      >>>>>> To unsubscribe e-mail to:
> >>      >>>>> [email protected]
> >>      <mailto:documentation%[email protected]>
> >>      >>>>>> Problems?
> >>      >>>>>
> >>
> https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> >>      >>>>>> Posting guidelines + more:
> >>      >>>>> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> >>      >>>>>> List archive:
> >>      >>>>> https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
> >>      >>>>>> Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
> >>      >>>>>
> >>
>

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: [email protected]
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/documentation/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Reply via email to