Hey Nigel, the resolution of that camera is 640x480 (VGA) and I think still a 
bit low for very fine inspections.
At $39 it is certainly worth giving it a try..
Rob



.............................................




________________________________
From: Nigel Baker <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 18 June, 2010 10:40:05 AM
Subject: Re: [DOG mailing list] hand held inspection camera+ dimona fuel tank 
design Q

 
This is a message I sent to few guys on the same 
subject. I have one of these and reckon it is great.
Best part is hi tthe button and it stores the image 
to file so you can save it anywhere you like. Powered by your laptop 
USB.
 
G'day John and Al.
I checked with kevin.
He got the Otek Flexi Snake Cam from "Sams 
Warehouse" for $59.00
http://catalogues.samswarehouse.com.au/portal/storelocator?location=5141%2CSUMMERTOWN+SA
 
I also found a website that advertises it at even 
less posted to you.
http://www.crazysales.com.au/fiberscope-flexi-snake-camera-endoscope-with-carry-case_p12787.html
Cheers.
Nige.
----- Original Message ----- 
>From: Ian Mc Phee 
>To: DOG LIST 
>Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 7:09 
>  PM
>Subject: [DOG mailing list] hand held 
>  inspection camera+ dimona fuel tank design Q
>
>
>Has anybody used the devise below - a bit cheaper from Hare & Forbes 
>  and Altronics than ebay
>
>http://cgi.ebay.com.au/2-4GHZ-Wireless-Gooseneck-Handheld-Inspection-Camera-/160443929269?cmd=ViewItem&pt=AU_B_I_Electrical_Test_Equipment&hash=item255b3412b5#ht_1858wt_1138
> 
>
>
>http://www.altronics.com.au/index.asp?area=item&id=S8745
>
>
>Also was surprised the dimona fuel tank really does not have a well for 
>  unusable fuel. Personally I like tanks with a well which goes to tank drain 
>  and fuel to engine is via finger filter which is above the tank unusable 
> well 
>  and then it goes via a gascolator which would also have its drain
>
>
>Was thinking of replacing the "inline" filter behind the back of baggage 
>  rear bulkhead with a gascolator but it was no point. I think it is poor 
>   design and what you would see in GA. 
>
>
>What do others think 
>
>
>Ian McPhee  


      

Reply via email to