Patients with locally advanced, unresectable gallbladder carcinoma may
present with symptoms of jaundice, pain, and bowel obstruction. These
patients have a limited life expectancy, on the order of months,
especially in the setting of liver and/or peritoneal dissemination.
Different palliative treatment aimed at relief of pain,jaundice,
intestinal obstruction, and prolongation of life, has been discussed:

Sunday, June 22, 2008
Cancer gallbladder; treatment of advance and unresectable disease.

Patients with locally advanced, unresectable gallbladder carcinoma may present 
with symptoms of jaundice, pain, and bowel obstruction. These patients have a 
limited life expectancy, on the order of months, especially in the setting of 
liver and/or peritoneal dissemination.

    * The treatment of locally advanced, unresectable gallbladder carcinoma is 
palliation aimed at relief of pain, jaundice, and bowel obstruction, along with 
prolongation of life.

    * Patients who have pain from local growth may benefit from radiation 
therapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy.
    * Although biliary or intestinal bypass can be considered, a percutaneous 
or endoscopic approach may be preferred, given the limited median survival in 
patients with advanced disease (generally, less than six months).

Recurrence
In a recent retrospective review of the patterns of initial disease recurrence 
after potentially curative surgical resection, Jarnagin et al. followed 80 
patients with gallbladder carcinoma and compared them to 76 patients with hilar 
cholangiocarcinoma.

    * The median time to disease recurrence was shorter for gallbladder 
carcinoma patients (11.5 months) compared to patients with hilar 
cholangiocarcinoma (20.3 months).
    * At a median follow-up of 24 months, 68% of patients with hilar 
cholangiocarcinoma and 66% of patients with gallbladder carcinoma suffered 
disease recurrence.
    * The site of initial disease recurrence was locoregional in only 15% of 
patients with gallbladder carcinoma compared to 59% of patients with hilar 
cholangiocarcinoma.
    * In contrast, 85% of patients with gallbladder carcinoma had a distant 
(+/−locoregional) site as their initial site of failure compared to 41% 
of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
    * This study provides considerable insight into the clinical behavior of 
these malignancies and suggests that in the case of gallbladder carcinoma, 
improvements in survival are most likely to be achieved with more effective 
systemic therapies as opposed to adjuvant treatment such as radiation therapy 
designed to achieve better locoregional control.

Radiation therapy

External beam radiation(EBRT) may be considered for palliative management of 
patients with locally advanced disease, particularly if there is no evidence of 
metastatic disease, and patients are symptomatic. At the time of exploration, 
the margins of unresectable and/or residual disease are often marked with 
radiopaque clips to facilitate treatment planning.

    * Hanna and Rider reported on 51 patients with gallbladder carcinoma from 
the Princess Margaret Hospital, 35 of whom underwent a potentially curative 
surgical resection and EBRT.
          o There was a survival advantage for those patients who received 
adjuvant EBRT in addition to surgery compared with those who had surgery alone.
    * Several other small, retrospective series consisting of heterogeneous 
groups of patients with diverse treatment schema and follow up criteria have 
been published, making definitive conclusions about the potential benefits of 
adjuvant EBRT difficult.
    * Most recently, Kresl et al. published their retrospective analysis of 
adjuvant EBRT with concurrent 5-FU after curative surgical resection in 21 
patients with gallbladder cancer treated at the Mayo Clinic from 1985 through 
1997. Patients with a margin-negative (R0) resection followed by adjuvant EBRT 
plus 5-FU had a favorable 5-year survival rate of 64%.
    * However, similar to the findings of Jarnagin et al. [58], 67% of the 
patients suffered distant failure, emphasizing the need for more effective 
adjuvant chemotherapy for this disease.

Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been advocated as a means to 
deliver high-dose, small-field therapy directly to the tumor bed without the 
dose limitations associated with EBRT. Todoroki et al. have reported the most 
substantial experience with IORT in 85 patients with AJCC stage IV gallbladder 
cancer who underwent aggressive surgical resection with or without IORT at a 
mean dose of 21 Gy.

    * Fortyseven patients in total received some form of radiation therapy 
(EBRT and/or IORT).
    * The local control rate was significantly higher after adjuvant 
radiotherapy (59%) than after resection alone (36%).
    * Moreover, the 5-year survival rate was significantly higher after 
adjuvant radiotherapy (9%) than after resection alone (3%), with the most 
pronounced improvement in 5-year survival rate (17%) in patients with only 
microscopic residual disease (R1 resection).

The role of radiation therapy for the palliation of symptoms such as jaundice, 
pain, and pruritus in patients with unresectable disease is difficult to 
ascertain as published studies consist of small numbers of patients with the 
significant confounding variable that most patients also underwent a biliary 
drainage procedure.

Chemotherapy

Most published studies concerning the role of chemotherapy in patients with 
locally advanced or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma are limited by the small 
numbers of patients and by the inclusion of patients with biliary tract cancers.

    * Unfortunately, no single chemotherapeutic agent or combination of agents 
has been identified to be effective in the treatment of this disease .
    * Though overall response rates range as high as 64%, complete responses 
are rare and median overall survival rates range from only 20 weeks to 15 
months.
    * 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), administered either alone or in combination, is the 
most extensively studied chemotherapeutic agent for this disease.
    * In a prospective, randomized study of 53 patients with advanced 
gallbladder cancer treated with oral 5-FU alone or in combinationwith either 
streptozocin or methyl-CCNU, objective response rates ranged from 5 to 12% in 
the three treatment arms.
    * 5-FU administered in combination with doxorubicin and mitomycin C (FAM) 
or in combination with cisplatin and epirubicin (CEF) has yielded response 
rates of 8% and 33%, respectively.
    * Better response rates have been published in patients treated with 
combinations of 5-FU with hydroxyurea (30%) or interferon alpha-2b (34%).

Other chemotherapeutic agents have exhibited variable success in the treatment 
of advanced gallbladder cancer. Cisplatin, mitomycin C, paclitaxel, and CPT-11 
have produced response rates of 10% or less as single agents.

    * In contrast, four of eight patients with gallbladder carcinoma treated 
with single-agent oral capecitabine had either a complete (n =2) or partial (n 
=2) response.
    * Several case reports have shown that gemcitabine is active in the 
treatment of patients with gallbladder carcinoma.
    * Accordingly, several phase II studies of gemcitabine in combination with 
other agents have subsequently been reported.
    * Gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin has yielded response rates of 
36 to 64%; in combination with docetaxel yielded a response rate of only 9%; 
and in combination with 5-FU has produced response rates of 9 to 33%.
    * Based on these studies, it appears that gemcitabine is an important 
component of the systemic therapy of gallbladder carcinoma, but additional 
studies of gemcitabine in combination with other agents are warranted, as the 
survival benefit with existing regimens is modest at best.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy has been studied in a few patients with 
locally unresectable gallbladder cancer.

    * Partial response rates of up to 60% have been reported, but the median 
duration of response was only 3 months and all patients developed progressive 
disease.
    * The median overall survival rates of 12 to 14 months in these studies is 
comparable to that achieved with intravenous chemotherapy, providing little 
impetus to recommend this more complicated mode of drug delivery.

Targeted therapy —

Early data suggest possible benefit from blockade of the epidermal growth 
factor receptor (EGFR) by the oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib.

    * In one study, 42 patients with advanced biliary cancer (not stratified 
according to primary site), 57 percent of whom had received prior chemotherapy, 
received erlotinib (150 mg daily).
    * There were three partial responses (two with documented expression of 
EGFR) and seven additional patients remained progression-free at six months.
    * All responding patients had mile (grade 1 or 2) skin toxicity.

    * Further experience with this drug is needed, particularly combined with 
cytotoxic chemotherapy.

Palliative surgery

For patients with unresectable disease detected radiographically or 
laparoscopically, biliary drainage is best achieved by endoscopic or 
percutaneous means.

    * If unresectable disease is discovered at the time of laparotomy, a 
biliary bypass (hepaticojejunostomy or segment III bypass) can be performed.
    * However, in a prospective study of 21 consecutive patients with 
unresectable gallbladder cancer who underwent a segment III bypass, six (29%) 
suffered complications; three (14.3%) patients had bile leaks, and three 
patients died as a result of the procedure.
    * The median survival of these 21 patients was only 20 weeks, and all but 
three patients died within 32 weeks of the surgery.
    * Given this limited life expectancy, patients with unresectable 
gallbladder cancer and biliary obstruction are best palliated by percutaneous 
or endoscopic stenting.

Intestinal bypass offers durable relief of intestinal obstruction, though there 
are reports of excellent palliation of malignant duodenal obstruction by the 
endoscopic placement of expandable metal Wallstents.


Posted by jitendraagrawal2000 at 10:06 PM


Dr. Jitendra Agrawal, Kanpur, India.

Kirim email ke