Yes, we really need it (for the SWIG interface). But since it is not visible in the interface we can name it anything we like (doesn't need to look nice). How about real_array?
/Anders Garth N. Wells wrote: > > Garth N. Wells wrote: >> Åsmund Ødegård wrote: >>> 515>hg update >>> abort: case-folding collision between src/kernel/common/dolfin/Array.h >>> and src/kernel/common/dolfin/array.h >>> >> I don't see a file array.h, only Array.h >> >> Garth >> > > I see that it was introduced in the last changeset. > > Do we really need array.h? It looks to me like one could easily make a > mess of it. The only functionality it provides over a plain array is > that it knows its length. > > Garth > > >>> There are still computers out there that does not behave as they >>> should when files have names differing only in case. To be more >>> precise, to support OSX, either array.h or Array.h must be removed! >>> >>> mvh, >> _______________________________________________ >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
