Anders Logg wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 01:52:36PM +0100, DOLFIN wrote:
>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
>> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
>>
>> changeset:   3463:8951cec821a5d4f6d6f9c983cbcb836fb2c5a1b8
>> tag:         tip
>> parent:      3462:b8f73cb2e5a998999fb9a5ac714ebec11890f7a8
>> parent:      3452:44e94b868ca473f050bf02d606179e0161299d12
>> user:        "Ola Skavhaug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
>> date:        Fri Dec 07 12:21:11 2007 +0100
> 
> A short summary:
> 
> 1. A new base class GenericSparsityPattern has been added.
> 
> 2. A new base class LinearAlgebraFactory has been added.
> 
> 3. Implementations of the factory interface has been added for all
> backends (PETSc and uBLAS).
> 
> This makes it possible to use different representations of the
> sparsity pattern for different backends (Trilinos has its own) but
> reuse the same interface.
> 
> Also, the factories can be used to propagate the choice of backend to
> places where we need to create new matrices or vectors. For example,
> in DiscreteFunction we do
> 
>   x = new Vector(n);
> 
> which ties the implementation of DiscreteFunction to the default
> DOLFIN backend. Instead, one can now call the factory() function on
> any linear algebra object (like a vector or matrix) and get a
> singleton factory that knows how to create matrices and vectors that
> use the same backend as the object the factory was taken from.
> 
> Altogether, this means that we can now add a backend for Trilinos
> (Epetra) and users of DOLFIN can use their own backend (by
> implementing wrappers that follow the interfaces GenericMatrix,
> GenericVector and GenericSparsityPattern) and use those with DOLFIN.
> 

Nice. Can we expect the merge with PyCC to accelerate now that this 
issue has been worked out?

Garth


_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to