On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 07:24:23PM +0100, Åsmund Ødegård wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Åsmund Ødegård <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > This seems a bit strange. 'src' in the root-dir of dolfin is > supposed > > > > > > to be a symlink to 'dolfin' > > > > > > > > > [snip > > > > > > > > > > > Is it necessary to have the src symlink? > > > > > > > > It hasn't been supported by hg previously (I think) so it may break. > > > > > > > > > > Various places in simula_scons, it is assumed that the main sources is > > > located in src/, as the projectname is variable (dolfin, pycc,....) > > > > > > I think this is mostly a convenience, we might go ahe > > > (hit send by accident...) > > ahead and dig out all locations relying on this, and replace with > > env["projectname"] instead. > > ok, sounds good. > > One thing I wonder is how changes should be made to the build system > under scons? > > I guess the changes need to take place in the simulascons repository > (wherever that may be located, I forget where it is) and then copied > into the DOLFIN repository.
Yes, that will be the prefered way. Right now, simula-scons is located at svn.simula.no, but I don't mind moving it over to fenics.org/hg for instance. Also, Johannes will create a debian package for simula-scons, so in the near future we can probably remove simula-scons from the dolfin tree, and just let dolfin depend on simula-scons. > > Is it ok to make changes in the scons subdirectory, or should we > rather ask you or Johannes to make the changes so that you can > synchronize with simula-scons? For now, ask one of us to make changes. Mandus _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
