2008/4/1, Kent-Andre Mardal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > tir, 01.04.2008 kl. 11.08 +0200, skrev Martin Sandve Alnæs: > > > I don't see what's the point of that. The only reasons for > > Matrix/Vector are related to having a single LA backend in each > > application run, but a variety of solvers may be used in the same > > application. > > > > > I thought the reason for having Matrix/Vector was to ensure that only > GenericMatrix/GenericVector functionality was used. I guess the PETSc > and the uBlas families now live seperate lives.
Then why don't you come up with an example of where this makes sense for solvers. -- Martin _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
