Would it be better to put the functions for casting in GenericVector (or 
perhaps even better in GenericTensor)?

Garth

Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
> I think I'm done, but I'm not able to run the tests even on an
> unmodified dolfin...
> There's something fishy with the system I'm on now.
> 
> If you can pull from
>   hg pull ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]//home/martinal/hg/dolfin
> run the tests and push if it works, that would be great.
> 
> I have to run now, so I'll have to finish this later if there's anything 
> wrong.
> 
> --
> Martin
> 
> 
> 2008/4/11, Ilmar Wilbers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> OK, let me know when you are done.
>>
>>  ilmar
>>
>>
>> Edit: sending to list
>>
>>
>>  Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote:
>>  > Wait... I got into a merge...
>>  >
>>  > 2008/4/11, Martin Sandve Alnæs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>  >
>>  >> Can someone with a petsc installation pull from
>>  >>     hg pull ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]//home/martinal/hg/dolfin
>>  >>  and check that it compiles, that the tests run, and then push it?
>>  >>  I've done changes to uBlasVector and PETScVector but don't have petsc 
>> here...
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >>  I've implemented type casting with only references in the user
>>  >>  interface, which works like this:
>>  >>
>>  >>  void foo(GenericVector & gv)
>>  >>  {
>>  >>   uBlasVector & v = as_uBlasVector(gv);
>>  >>   ublas_vector & w = v.vec();
>>  >>
>>  >>   // or:
>>  >>
>>  >>   ublas_vector & u = as_ublas_vector(gv);
>>  >>   ...
>>  >>  }
>>  >>
>>  >>  The as_* functions assumes that the input is of the correct underlying
>>  >>  type and triggers a dolfin error on failure. There's also an is_*
>>  >>  function:
>>  >>
>>  >>   if(is_uBlasVector(gv))
>>  >>     trigger_ublas_solver_for_example(gv);
>>  >>
>>  >>  I've implemented similar functions for PETScVector, but I didn't have
>>  >>  petsc installed here so I haven't tried to compile them.
>>  >>
>>  >>  Selecting good names for these are tricky, since we're dealing with
>>  >>  names like uBlasVector, ublas_vector, PETScVector, and (PETSc) Vec,
>>  >>  consistency is futile... Suggestions for better names?
>>  >>
>>  >>  --
>>  >>
>>  >> Martin
>>  >>
>>  >>
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>  DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>>  [email protected]
>>  http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to