On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:11:44PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:05:47PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I've made an attempt to cleanup the GenericFoo interfaces and make > > > them consistent. (I also added a few functions, for example A *= a, > > > x += y etc.) > > > > > > Can everyone interested please take a look and see that things look good > > > for GenericTensor, GenericMatrix and GenericVector, even including the > > > order of definition of functions, punctuation in comments etc. > > > > The copy function is removed from GenericVector but is in the subclasses. > > I'd like GenericVector to have the copy function. Any reason to not have it > > ? > > > > Kent > > I didn't remove it today (as far as I know). So I don't mind adding it > back.
ok, copy() is now back in GenericTensor. -- Anders _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
