On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 09:46:23PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > 2008/6/16 Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 07:06:20PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > >> I think DofMapSet should be independent of the form it was initialized > >> with. > >> I believe the sharing of a single set of dofmaps among different forms is > >> one > >> of the key tasks of this class, and that the vector with form argument > >> dofmaps > >> should rather be obtained on demand: > > > > Agree. > > > >> // Get vector of dofmaps (possibly not unique) for each argument of form > >> dofmapvector = dofmapset.getDofMaps(form); > > > > What does this function do? > > Gets a vector<DofMap*> with length equal to form.rank() + > form.num_coefficients(), > where each DofMap* is the same if the signature is the same. > In other words, constructs and returns what is currently a member: > > // Array of dof maps for current form > std::vector<DofMap*> dof_map_set; > > but on the fly for a given form such that DofMapSet isn't > associated with any particular form.
ok, now I understand what you mean. But I would suggest DofMap& dof_map = dofmapset.extractDofMap(form, i); Or are we going to pass around Arrays of DofMaps? -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
