2008/6/30 Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >> The best way to achieve good UFC compatibility is to limit >> assumptions about the form compilers to a minimum, and >> (a) ufl form >> (b) which compiler? >> (c) a generic set of compiler options (any kind of object) >> sounds to me like a good generalization. > > Sounds good. We can just have a parameter > > form_compiler_options > > which is passed on to the form compiler in assemble(). > > Should the choice of form compiler be an argument to assemble() or > should it be a global option set by dolfin_set()?
I think that can safely stay a global option, at least for now. In particular, mixing form compilers in one application will be messy because of dofmaps, and I don't think fixing that is where we want to spend our time. -- Martin _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
