On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 09:35:15AM +0200, Ola Skavhaug wrote: > Could we add a default constructor to Parameter, e.g., letting it default to > int or similar? This will make it possible to wrap it with SWIG. The current > state of SWIG will declare variables like this (depending on where > Parameter lives in the argument list): > > Parameter arg3; > > This fails due to the lack of default constructor for Parameter. I don't know > how to get around this silly SWIG behaviour. > > Ola
We could add a default constructor for an int parameter named "undefined" with value 0 or similar. Parameter is never used directly by a user anyway (since it will be cast automatically to the underlying type). -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
