Added my results as well. It looks as though they are quite similar to Garth's.
ilmar Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:44:25PM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:05:22PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >>> Anders Logg wrote: >>> >>>> I have made some further adjustments to the assembly benchmark in >>>> >>>> bench/fem/assembly/cpp >>>> >>>> The results are here: >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin?f=82bebeaa545c;file=bench/fem/assembly/cpp/bench.log >>>> >>>> Before trying to conclude anything from the results, please run the >>>> benchmark and report your results. There may still be bugs. Please take >>>> a look at the benchmark code as well, it's fairly short. It would be >>>> good if we could settle on a fixed benchmark that we all trust and >>>> then continue to discuss what to do about improving the numbers. >>>> >>>> >>> My results are quite different, so perhaps we could post results with >>> machine details, compiler options, etc, to the wiki? >>> >>> Garth >>> >> Sounds like a good idea. >> > > ok, here's the page, let's see some numbers: > > http://www.fenics.org/wiki/Benchmark > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
