On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Garth N. Wells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Whether or not something is being run in parallel should be determined by > the number of processes, > > uint dolfin::MPI::num_processes() > > Garth > Yes, I am aware of that, but I want to have a bit more control over the parallelisation. What I want is a number of processes each solving an independent eigenvalue system (actually I am doing a sweep in frequency for an electromagnetic problem and each frequency point has its own eigensystem). I did send an earlier mail discussing this. Any help with swig would be much appreciated. Evan > Evan Lezar wrote: > >> Hi >> >> I have added a constructor to PETScMatrix to allow me to control whether >> the matrix is to be created in parallel or not. The declarations are given >> below >> >> /// Create empty matrix >> explicit PETScMatrix(Type type=default_matrix); >> >> /// Create an empty matrix explicitly setting the parallel flag >> explicit PETScMatrix(bool is_parallel, Type type=default_matrix); >> >> The idea is that I use >> >> S = PETScMatrix(False) >> If I want to create a matrix that is local. The problem is that swig >> can't differentiate between Type and bool (and uint for the PETScMatrix(uint >> M, uint N, Type type=default_matrix); constructor). I have seen that it is >> possible to rename PETScMatrix(bool) to PETScMatrix_bool(bool) for example >> so that the python call would be >> >> S = PETScMatrix_bool(False), >> >> but I can't seem to get this working. Any suggestions? >> >> Thanks >> Evan >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
