On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 02:25:37PM +0100, Kristian Oelgaard wrote:
> Quoting Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 09:24:37PM +0100, DOLFIN wrote:
> > > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> > > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> > >
> > > changeset: 5158:8f5618bc84be42a36517969786370689478b2fe2
> > > tag: tip
> > > user: Anders Logg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > date: Fri Nov 14 21:24:28 2008 +0100
> > > files: dolfin/mesh/Mesh.cpp sandbox/misc/main.cpp
> > test/unit/function/cpp/test.cpp test/unit/mesh/cpp/test.cpp
> > > description:
> > > Fix bug in init: only init when needed. Unit tests work again now.
> >
> > I think we're back on track again. The mesh-ordering/init strategy is
> > worked out (at least I think it looks good), and there is no call to
> > mesh.order() in any of the demos.
>
> The function
>
> void PointCell::order(Cell& cell) const
> {
> error("PointCell::order() not defined.");
> }
>
> in dolfin/mesh/PointCell.cpp kills the assembly over facet integrals.
> Should it throw an error or should it simply do nothing?I think it should do nothing. But why is this not detected when running the demos? -- Anders > Kristian > > > Two demos are still failing: > > > > pde/periodic: segmentation fault > > pde/sym-dirichlet-bc: assemble_system missing > > > > Is anyone planning to fix assemble_system? I guess I need to look at > > PeriodicBC. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
