On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 05:52:01PM +0100, Anders Logg wrote: > On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 03:56:10PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > > > DOLFIN wrote: > > > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository. > > > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below. > > > > > > changeset: 5428:5ee944b2216752dd3078f0906c9500837a65097a > > > tag: tip > > > user: "Johan Hake <[email protected]>" > > > date: Sat Dec 20 22:59:46 2008 +0100 > > > files: demo/pde/dg/advection-diffusion/cpp/main.cpp > > > demo/pde/dg/advection-diffusion/python/demo.py > > > dolfin/function/SpecialFunctions.cpp dolfin/function/SpecialFunctions.h > > > site-packages/dolfin/specialfunctions.py > > > description: > > > Work on getting dg advection-diffusion demo to work in python > > > - Changed name of OutFlowFacet function to Is... > > > - IsOutFlowFacet is instantiated using a FunctionSpace and a field > > > funtion > > > - the evaluation of IsOutFlowFacet is done by evaluating the field in > > > the midpoint > > > of the facet > > > - Does not work properly yet. > > > > > > > What's the status of this? Is anyone working on it and what needs to be > > done? > > > > Garth > > We need to move part of FunctionSpace::eval() to another function so > we can reuse it from IsOutFlowFacet::eval(). I'll have a look as soon > as I get a chance, maybe even tonight. > > Once this is in place, the two advection-diffusion demos need to be > looked at, and then the two nonlinear demos.
I've made the changes to Function, FunctionSpace, and IsOutflowFacet. Wouldn't it be natural to use IsOutflowFacet in both the C++ and Python demos? It seems unnecessary to reimplement IsOutflowFacet in the demo. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
