On Fri, January 16, 2009 13:22, Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday 16 January 2009 13:18:23 Johannes Ring wrote: >> On Fri, January 16, 2009 13:06, Johan Hake wrote: >> > On Friday 16 January 2009 13:03:20 Johannes Ring wrote: >> >> On Fri, January 16, 2009 09:08, Kent Andre wrote: >> >> > On to., 2009-01-15 at 19:05 +0100, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >> >> >> I don't know, but I noticed these lines: >> >> >> >> >> >> A_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraMatrix(A).mat() >> >> >> b_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraVector(b).vec() >> >> >> x_epetra = cpp.down_cast_EpetraVector(U.vector()).vec() >> >> >> >> >> >> you should be able to do just >> >> >> >> >> >> A_epetra = down_cast(A).mat() >> >> >> b_epetra = down_cast(b).vec() >> >> >> x_epetra = down_cast(U.vector()).vec() >> >> >> >> >> >> the type is found in a python layer by introspection. >> >> >> >> >> >> Martin >> >> > >> >> > OK. >> >> > >> >> > Trilinos and Dolfin are compiled with different versions of SWIG. >> >> >> >> Anyone >> >> >> >> > have experience with this? Could this be the problem? >> >> >> >> The Trilinos packages at packages.simula.no are now recompiled with >> SWIG >> >> 1.3.37. They are only available for Hardy at the moment. Let me know >> if >> >> anyone wants me to build Trilinos packages for Intrepid as well. >> > >> > If you compile PyDOLFIN with swig 1.3.37, (and that could actually be >> > nice), >> > you also have to compiled Trilinos with this version. >> >> I haven't touched the DOLFIN packages, only the Trilinos packages has >> been >> rebuilt. > > Ok, but I suppose you built the hardy DOLFIN with swig 1.3.37?
No, the DOLFIN 0.9.0 packages were built with standard Hardy SWIG (i.e. version 1.3.33). This was sometimes last week I think, before you made your changes. Johannes _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
