On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Johan Hake <[email protected]> wrote: > On Friday 06 February 2009 16:12:06 Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 3:50 PM, DOLFIN <[email protected]> wrote: >> > - The variable dolfin.__version__ now holds the version of DOLFIN. This >> > is used when calling the jit compiler, adding this to the signature of >> > the form >> >> By the "jit compiler", do you mean compilation of dolfin functions? If >> so, that sounds good. > > Actually not, but it makes sense to include it. Will do.
Nice. Compilation of dolfin functions do depend on the dolfin version, so this is important. >> Or do you mean when calling jit from FFC? If so, why? > > Well, I think that we concluded, in a thread far from now, that we should > include the DOLFIN version in the signature of the form compilations, so I > threw it in. I don't recall any such conclusion, and don't understand why? > First it probably won't heart beeing in, but may not make too much sense, as > we compile pure UFC forms. We should maybee include the ufc version > instead/too? Good idea. I'd say instead, unless the compiled module includes dolfin wrapper code in which case adding the dolfin version makes sense. Martin _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
