On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:02:19AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 09:54:09AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> DOLFIN wrote: > >>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository. > >>> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below. > >>> > >>> changeset: 5659:16e95d7eed387c4e6fb8d1f0235d0f5eb0a0eb91 > >>> tag: tip > >>> parent: 5658:d6d661c979340701f12565329dd7019204dee78e > >>> parent: 5657:e893f260884275f77ce803fbf3220f140c678760 > >>> user: Anders Logg <[email protected]> > >>> date: Tue Feb 10 10:49:43 2009 +0100 > >>> files: dolfin/function/GenericFunction.h > >>> description: > >>> merge > >>> > >>> > >>> changeset: 5658:d6d661c979340701f12565329dd7019204dee78e > >>> parent: 5656:294c8d6cab0b74a2aefde88fce5f022cd7ffae2f > >>> user: Anders Logg <[email protected]> > >>> date: Tue Feb 10 10:49:34 2009 +0100 > >>> files: dolfin/ode/ODESolution.cpp dolfin/ode/TimeStepper.cpp > >>> dolfin/ode/TimeStepper.h dolfin/parameter/Parameter.cpp > >>> dolfin/parameter/Parameter.h dolfin/parameter/ParameterList.cpp > >>> dolfin/parameter/ParameterList.h > >>> description: > >>> Fixes for sensitive checks T - t < eps instead of t > T - eps etc. > >>> Still memory leaks. > >>> > >> Have you looked at ODESolution::interpolate? > >> > >> Garth > > > > Why is that one a problem? I think it looks good. Does valgrind > > mention it when you run? > > > > When I commented out the call to ODESolution::interpolate I didn't get > any valgrind errors, but this could have had other effects. > > Garth
I guess it was a strange side effect. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
