On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:56:17AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Johannes Ring wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Both FFC and DOLFIN fails during tests because of missing ufl module: > > > > ImportError: No module named ufl > > > > Does FFC (and DOLFIN?) now depend on UFL? Should I add UFL to the buildbot? > > > > I expect that the next release of FFC will depend on UFL, so UFL should > be added to the buildbot. > > Garth
Yes, that's the plan for the next FFC release (which will be 0.9.0). -- Anders > > > Johannes > > > > On Sat, March 7, 2009 04:50, [email protected] wrote: > >> The Buildbot has detected a new failure of dolfin-hardy-i386 on FEniCS > >> Buildbot. > >> Full details are available at: > >> http://fenics.org:8080/builders/dolfin-hardy-i386/builds/94 > >> > >> Buildbot URL: http://fenics.org:8080/ > >> > >> Buildslave for this Build: hardy-i386 > >> > >> Build Reason: > >> Build Source Stamp: HEAD > >> Blamelist: > >> > >> BUILD FAILED: failed dolfin check > >> > >> sincerely, > >> -The Buildbot > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> DOLFIN-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
