On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:36:59PM +0200, Martin Sandve Alnæs wrote: > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Anders Logg <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:13:41AM +0200, Johan Hake wrote: > >> On Monday 13 April 2009 22:23:12 Robert Kirby wrote: > >> > I didn't see it as a sub of cpp. thanks for pointing that out. no_prec > >> > is > >> > a better namegiven what "None" means in python. > >> > >> I think that it was not imported to the main dolfin namespace because of it > >> resemblens to the Python None. > >> > >> Untill we have settled the enum vs string vs parameters we can just > >> declare a > >> variable in the PyDOLFIN namespace > >> > >> no_prec = 0 > >> > >> which would work fine in this case as the enums from DOLFIN is mapped to > >> integer variables in Python. > >> > >> Johan > > > > I vote for strings, and using the parameter system whenever possible. > > A nice feature for the parameter system would be printing a message with valid > values whenever the user tries to set some string that doesn't make sense. > > Martin
Yes, that would be good to have. Added to TODO list. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
