On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 07:33:08AM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > On Sat, April 25, 2009 07:22, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > > > Anders Logg wrote: > >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 08:53:50PM +0200, Johannes Ring wrote: > >>> On Fri, April 24, 2009 18:56, DOLFIN wrote: > >>>> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository. > >>>> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below. > >>>> > >>>> changeset: 6026:b30965648ff4b42614058960be4e3e413e065f32 > >>>> tag: tip > >>>> user: "Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>" > >>>> date: Fri Apr 24 17:56:13 2009 +0100 > >>>> files: SConstruct scons/simula-scons/simula_scons/__init__.py > >>>> description: > >>>> BoolOption -> BoolVariable to precent depracation warning. > >>> This change does not work with the SCons version that is in Hardy: > >>> > >>> http://fenics.org:8080/builders/dolfin-hardy-i386/builds/233/steps/dolfin%20build/logs/stdio > >>> > > > > I thought that this might happen. > > > >>> Should we require a newer SCons? > >>> > >>> Johannes > >> > >> That would be ok for me, but there may be other opinions. > >> > > > > OK with me too. There is another deprecate warning that it would be nice > > to get rid of > > > > scons: warning: The PathOption() function is deprecated; use the > > PathVariable() function instead. > > > > but this may require a simula_scons change. > > OK, which version should be the new required version? 0.98.5, the one in > Intrepid? > > EnsureSConsVersion(0, 98, 5) > > ? > > Then we can finally use GetBuildFailures to check for build failures.
That would be *really* good. It's a bit funny now that the build system does not know if the build failed: Hey, I'm the build system and I don't know if this worked or not but look at the lines above for signs of error messages. :-) -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
