Kent Andre wrote: >> Not sure what we have to do actually. I suppose I want get any clue from the >> >> demo/function/restriction >> >> demo? >> >> I see that Kent has modified the dolfin.FunctionSpace to reflect the present >> (broken) implementation of restriction, anything in that line? Should such >> an >> implementation has been done in FunctionSpaceBase instead of FunctionSpace? >> Kent? >> >> Johan >> > > This restriction is different in the sense that the restriction is made > by the standard element on a sub mesh. > > The restriction in focus now is on the complete mesh but for only > a part of the element. > > Combined, these two features will be very powerful. I guess the > sub-mesh restriction stuff is broken due to the parallel mesh. >
Yes, we had to clean-up the DofMap in particular to make progress with parallel assembly which means that sub-mesh restriction is broken at the moment. Garth > Kent > > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
