Ola Skavhaug wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Garth N. Wells<[email protected]> wrote:
>> I didn't realise until recently that storage in std::vector is
>> guaranteed by the C++ standard to be contiguous (versus only being
>> contiguous in all known implementations). Using this, I think that we
>> can have safer and cleaner code by using more std::vector in the linear
>> algebra interface. For example, we could have
>>
>>   GenericVector::get(std::vector<double>& );
>>   GenericVector::set(const std::vector<double>& );
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>   GenericVector::get(double* x);
>>   GenericVector::set(const double* x);
>>
>> For backends that want a pointer to an array, we can pass &x[0]. Any
>> opinions?
> 
> I completely agree. I didn't know this either, but Google told me
> you're right, .i.e, that C++03 guarantees contiguity. Looking forward
> to C++0x when arrays will be contiguous as well.
> 

Not sure you mean about arrays. Do you mean multi-dimensional arrays?

Garth

> Ola
> 
>> Garth
>> _______________________________________________
>> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
>>
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to