On Tuesday 08 September 2009 12:58:41 Anders Logg wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:54:01PM +0200, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > DOLFIN wrote: > > > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository. > > > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below. > > > > > > changeset: 6975:37efb9fe9fe684b23521574a89048705a9a0bc6e > > > tag: tip > > > parent: 6974:6c4c77900222f82b7b32888b29a08fef9ddc5789 > > > parent: 6973:abda55b5dfa2b2d0fbe2614b15483911ef661fdc > > > user: Anders Logg <[email protected]> > > > date: Tue Sep 08 12:51:01 2009 +0200 > > > files: > > > description: > > > merge > > > > > > > > > changeset: 6974:6c4c77900222f82b7b32888b29a08fef9ddc5789 > > > parent: 6970:5d7fc35d3e597db508a005826efacb8dea6a00d9 > > > user: Anders Logg <[email protected]> > > > date: Tue Sep 08 12:01:43 2009 +0200 > > > files: dolfin/fem/DofMap.cpp dolfin/fem/DofMap.h > > > description: > > > Make tabulate_facet_dofs accessible without having a ufc::cell, which > > > makes it easy to access using iterators in Python. > > > > Can we remove the version that takes a ufc::cell? > > Yes. Perhaps we should remove all the direct wrappers for UFC stuff > and add a member function to return the underlying UFC object? > > const ufc::dof_map& ufc_dof_map() const;
Should this be a member function of dolfin::DofMap? If so, it might be sufficient with const ufc::dof_map& ufc() const; If we are consistent this should not cause any confusion. I have thought of doing the same in the python interface where there exist a number of different versions of these basic types. It would be nice to be able to extract the ufl or ufc form from a dolfin.Form, using ufl() or ufc(). Johan > -- > Anders > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
