On Tuesday 22 September 2009 14:57:16 DOLFIN wrote: > One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository. > A short summary of the last three changesets is included below. > > changeset: 7134:18c7e560897b > tag: tip > user: "Johan Hake <[email protected]>" > date: Tue Sep 22 14:57:13 2009 +0200 > files: test/memory/dolfin_valgrind.supp > description: > A try to suppress some more annoying mpi valgrind complaints
In the memtest on the jaunty-amd64 buildbot there are some complaints related to gts and petsc: GTS: 72 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 40 of 67 at 0x4C278AE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) by 0x9077A12: g_malloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2000.1) by 0x908DB07: g_slice_alloc (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2000.1) by 0x9061812: g_hash_table_new_full (in /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2000.1) by 0x87D0E82: gts_object_class_new (in /usr/lib/libgts-0.7.so.5.0.1) by 0x87D0F3E: gts_object_class (in /usr/lib/libgts-0.7.so.5.0.1) by 0x87DCD0D: gts_bbox_class (in /usr/lib/libgts-0.7.so.5.0.1) by 0x5043E1E: dolfin::GTSInterface::create_box(dolfin::Cell const&) (GTSInterface.cpp:186) by 0x5043FFD: dolfin::GTSInterface::buildCellTree() (GTSInterface.cpp:198) by 0x5044134: dolfin::GTSInterface::GTSInterface(dolfin::Mesh const&) (GTSInterface.cpp:34) by 0x502DDA0: dolfin::IntersectionDetector::IntersectionDetector(dolfin::Mesh const&) (IntersectionDetector.cpp:30) by 0x4F67F67: dolfin::FunctionSpace::eval(double*, double const*, dolfin::Function const&) const (FunctionSpace.cpp:122) +++ PETSc: 96 bytes in 2 blocks are indirectly lost in loss record 55 of 67 at 0x4C278AE: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) by 0xC6A5059: (within /usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.0.0.0) by 0xC6D1503: PMPI_Attr_put (in /usr/lib/openmpi/lib/libmpi.so.0.0.0) by 0x76C6F1D: PetscCommDuplicate(ompi_communicator_t*, ompi_communicator_t**, int*) (tagm.c:233) by 0x764612F: PetscHeaderCreate_Private(_p_PetscObject*, int, int, char const*, ompi_communicator_t*, int (*)(_p_PetscObject*), int (*) (_p_PetscObject*, _p_PetscViewer*)) (inherit.c:44) by 0x7318595: VecCreate(ompi_communicator_t*, _p_Vec**) (veccreate.c:39) by 0x7379278: VecCreateSeq(ompi_communicator_t*, int, _p_Vec**) (vseqcr.c:38) by 0x4FE7B82: dolfin::PETScVector::init(unsigned int, unsigned int, std::string) (PETScVector.cpp:520) by 0x4FE884B: dolfin::PETScVector::PETScVector(std::string) (PETScVector.cpp:50) by 0x5016EEE: dolfin::PETScFactory::create_vector() const (PETScFactory.cpp:27) by 0x4F4C2E8: dolfin::VariationalProblem::solve_linear(dolfin::Function&) (Vector.h:32) by 0x438CB7: Eval::testArbitraryEval() (test.cpp:73) +++ Are these real leaks or false positives? Can someone with more knowledge of PETSc and/or GTS look at it? Johan > > changeset: 7133:5498ce4cf5fb > user: Anders Logg <[email protected]> > date: Tue Sep 22 14:19:00 2009 +0200 > files: test/system/parallel-assembly-solve/solver.py > description: > Keep tolerance 1e-10 in parallel system test but use as relative tolerance. > Should make buildbot happy. > > > changeset: 7132:0152cc635793 > user: "Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>" > date: Tue Sep 22 12:04:07 2009 +0100 > files: test/regression/test.py > description: > Remove elastodynamics demo from regression tests (too slow). > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For more details, visit http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin > _______________________________________________ > DOLFIN-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev > _______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
