On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 11:23:21AM +0200, Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 08:58:01AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:00:59PM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > > >>> 2. Use the Expression class in demos where appropriate (just need to > > >>> change the class name, everything else is the same). > > >>> > > >> Haven't you already done this everywhere? > > > > > > No, just in the Poisson demo. I'll fix the others later. > > > > > > > Any thoughts on how to deal with Dirichlet bcs? Constant works because > > it is a subclass of Function. Do we need a common base class for > > Function and Expression which has an eval function? > > We could add eval() to the Coefficient interface. Both Expression and > Function already have an eval() function.
Stupid comment. This is already there. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
