DOLFIN wrote:
> One or more new changesets pushed to the primary dolfin repository.
> A short summary of the last three changesets is included below.
> 
> changeset:   7190:f53c5b481d28
> tag:         tip
> user:        "Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>"
> date:        Wed Sep 30 17:07:18 2009 +0100
> files:       dolfin/fem/Form.cpp dolfin/fem/Form.h dolfin/fem/UFC.cpp 
> dolfin/function/SpecialFunctions.cpp dolfin/function/SpecialFunctions.h
> description:
> Prepare for probable removal of Function::Functon().
> 
> Make appropriate class in SpecialFunctions subclasses of Expression.
> 

DOLFIN can be compiled now without the constructor Function::Function(), 
but the demos can't. Need to think about how functions can be best 
initialised in the generated code.

Garth

> 
> changeset:   7189:3782f3222642
> user:        "Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>"
> date:        Wed Sep 30 16:52:58 2009 +0100
> files:       demo/pde/poisson/cpp/main.cpp dolfin/fem/Assembler.cpp 
> dolfin/fem/Form.cpp dolfin/fem/Form.h dolfin/fem/SystemAssembler.cpp 
> dolfin/fem/VariationalProblem.cpp dolfin/function/SpecialFunctions.h
> description:
> Return shared_ptr to FunctionSpaces from Form rather than references.
> 
> This makes it possible to initialise Functions without fear that the function 
> space will go out of scope. See VariationalProblem.
> 
> 
> changeset:   7188:437ee8b12a41
> user:        "Garth N. Wells <[email protected]>"
> date:        Wed Sep 30 16:04:46 2009 +0100
> files:       demo/pde/poisson/cpp/main.cpp dolfin/function/Function.cpp 
> dolfin/function/Function.h
> description:
> Remove some code.
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For more details, visit http://www.fenics.org/hg/dolfin
> _______________________________________________
> DOLFIN-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

_______________________________________________
DOLFIN-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev

Reply via email to