On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 01:10:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> Anders Logg wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:24:22PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>>> Anders Logg wrote: > >>>>> Are there any objections to making a new release (0.9.5)? > >>>>> > >>>> No, as long as you clean up the copious quantities of debugging output > >>>> which is being printed to the screen ;). > >>> I will. > >>> > >>>> Also, we should look at the DOLFIN Blueprints to see if anything else > >>>> should be done before a release. > >>> Sure. > >>> > >>>> If a release is made, I would like the next one to focus on the > >>>> Blueprints. There are some very important but non-trivial targets, like > >>>> more general parallel assembly, which should be addressed sooner rather > >>>> than later. > >>> Yes, 0.9.6 should be focused on bug fixes/blueprints. Parallel DG > >>> assembly is important > >> Not just DG - the symmetric application of boundary conditions is very > >> important too. > >> > >>> but it's not at the top of my list of > >>> priorities. > >>> > >> That's why we need to sometimes stick to the Blueprints - make sure that > >> important tasks don't get neglected. > > > > Yes, but parallel DG assembly is not very important for me. > > > > There is more than one Blueprint on the list.
I know. And as I said I agree that 0.9.6 should be focused on fixing bugs/blueprints. These two are currently at the top of my list of priorities but I expect to work on other blueprints / bugs for 0.9.6: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/solver-interfaces https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/add-intersection-functionality-for-nitsche -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DOLFIN-dev mailing list DOLFIN-dev@fenics.org http://www.fenics.org/mailman/listinfo/dolfin-dev
