Garth N. Wells wrote: > > Johan Hake wrote: >> On Monday 30 November 2009 19:01:25 Garth N. Wells wrote: >>> Johan Hake wrote: >>>> On Monday 30 November 2009 17:22:19 Garth N. Wells wrote: >>>>> Anders Logg wrote: >>>>>> If the built-in wrappers work, I suggest we use them instead of the >>>>>> our homemade versions even if the code increases if that makes the >>>>>> wrapper code easier to maintain. >>>>> I've had a look at this. Using the SWIG wrappers I've deleted tons of >>>>> our complicated wrapper code, and things that didn't work now do >>>>> automatically. I'll push a first go soon. >>>> I'am not at all satisfied with this change. I would have hoped that you >>>> at least could wait for my response on this issue, as the amount of hours >>>> of both payed and free time, I have put down on the code is quite large. >>>> I do not want to be grumpy, but I think the point is legitimate, as >>>> DOLFIN is a community project, and this change really turned me off. >>> That's what we have 'bzr revert' for. ;) Fell free to change it back if >>> you have a manageable solution. >> Sure, I was about to commit this evening but this somewhat turned me off ;) >> >
I reverted the change in lp:dolfin and created a new branch lp:~garth-wells/dolfin/dolfin-swig with the vector changes in the SWIG interface. Garth _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
