Question #95433 on DOLFIN changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/dolfin/+question/95433
Nuno Lopes gave more information on the question: In my case part of the problem is definitely with uBLAS and Umfpack: In 0.9.5 PETSc LU is much faster than uBLAS LU (factorized solve) ----------------------------------------------------------- Assemble cells | 0.011015 16.28 1478 Assemble exterior facets | 0.01 0.02 2 Build sparsity | 1.3532e-05 0.02 1478 Delete sparsity | 0 0 1478 Init tensor | 6.7659e-06 0.01 1478 LU solver | 0.020638 6.15 298 X:DOLFWAVE:END | 24.63 24.63 1 ......................................... Against the 83.71 s of uBLAS LU. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of DOLFIN Team, which is an answer contact for DOLFIN. _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
