On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:26:21PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > Anders Logg wrote: > > Question #97807 on DOLFIN changed: > > https://answers.launchpad.net/dolfin/+question/97807 > > > > Anders Logg posted a new comment: > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 07:21:03PM -0000, Garth Wells wrote: > >> Question #97807 on DOLFIN changed: > >> https://answers.launchpad.net/dolfin/+question/97807 > >> > >> Garth Wells posted a new comment: > >> I've just added a new function to DofMap: > >> > >> /// Return the set of dof indices > >> Set<dolfin::uint> list(const Mesh& mesh, bool sort = false) const; > >> > >> It can be particularly useful for mixed elements, since a for 'shallow' > >> sub-function it will give the entries in the 'big' function vector > >> associated with a particular field, e.g. > >> > >> boost::shared_ptr<FunctionSpace> V_sub = V[1]; > >> Set<dolfin::uint> sub_dof_list = V_sub->dofmap().list(mesh, true); > >> for (dolfin::uint i = 0; i < sub_dof_list.size(); ++i ) > >> cout << "i: " << i << " " << sub_dof_list[i] << endl; > > > > list does not seem to be an optimal name for this function. Something > > like dof_set() or just dofs() would be better. > > > > I can call it 'set' or 'dofs'. dof_set is redundant. > > Garth
ok, I think 'dofs' is the best option. 'set' sounds like it sets some value. -- Anders
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
