On 22. mai 2010 14:43, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > On 22/05/10 10:48, Anders Logg wrote: >> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 09:28:55AM +0100, Garth N. Wells wrote: >>> Is anyone using the LAPACK linear algebra wrappers? Since they are >>> not subclasses of GenericFoo, I suggest that we remove them and >>> users use Armadillo (http://arma.sourceforge.net/) instead when >>> wanting to access LAPACK/ATLAS functions. Armadillo is very easy to >>> use. Any objections to removing the LAPACK wrappers? >>> >>> We have a Blueprint for wrapping Armadillo, but this would only be >>> worthwhile if we want to assemble into an Armadillo-based object. >>> Since Armadillo will most commonly be used for small matrices when >>> performance is critical, and expression templates are one of its >>> very attractive features, I don't see much point in wrapping it. >>> >>> Garth >> >> I agree it would be better to wrap Armadillo (or use it directly), but >> the LAPACK wrappers are used heavily in the Extrapolation class so >> they can't be removed until that has been ported to use Armadillo. >> > > Turned out that only a few lines needed to be changed. > > Non-const integers are passed by reference as few times in > Extrapolation. Is it the intention that they change and are then used? >
Yes. -- Marie > Garth > >> -- >> Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
