[snip] > Just as a side note, we first consider changing the meaning of > TrialFunction to be a special subclass of Expression
Should that be Coefficient? > which (a Function > in DOLFIN) instead of an Argument. So one would always define a > nonlinear problem and it would always be linearized. Sounds like FEtk ;) > That would solve > some of the issues regarding the need for redefining u when a linear > problem is solved: > > u = TrialFunction(V) # now it's a trial function > ... > u = problem.solve() # now it's something different > > But we decided this would require too many changes. Yes, but I get the impression that you want to something like that but preserve backward compatability? Johan _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
