On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 11:17:36AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > On Wednesday December 1 2010 08:24:27 Johan Hake wrote: > > On Tuesday November 30 2010 22:55:29 Anders Logg wrote: > > > Perhaps we should create a simple script dolfin-version that prints > > > the current version to make it easy to check? > > > > I thought of that too. > > > > Maybee we should let CMake produce a script: > > > > dolfin-version > > > > and install it. Using the information in the CMake variable DOLFIN_VERSION? > > Done.
Great. > I also changed the present version, as set in the CMakeLists.txt to 0.9.9+. > This is now reflected in naming of the shared library: > > libdolfin.so.0.9.9+ > > Is it a problem that it does not end with a number? I think there was a problem with this at some point. I think I've tried it before, but we'll see. If something suddenly fails to link, we know why... > The __version__ string in PyDOLFIN is now also generate automagically :) Nice. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
