On 17/01/11 15:11, Andre Massing wrote: > Den 17.01.11 15.49, skrev Garth N. Wells: >> >> >> On 17/01/11 14:46, Andre Massing wrote: >>> Hi! >>> >>> I just realized that the previous member >>> >>> FiniteElement** coefficient_elements >>> and >>> std::vector<FiniteElement> finite_elements >>> , respectively were removed from the UFC class. >> >> The coefficient finite elements are still there. > > Yes, but I need the ones which correspond to the test and trial function > spaces. > >> >>> I need these ones or >>> more precisely access to the underlying ufc::finite_element. >>> >>> Can anybody give me a quick hint how to achieve this in the newer DOLFIN >>> versions? I already scanned through the code, but could not find a >>> simple solution. >>> >> >>> From a FunctionSpace, you can extract a dolfin::FiniteElement, followed >> by a ufc::finite_element. > > But not from within the UFC class since the dolfin::Form form member is > private. Since the UFC class takes a dolfin::Form argument in the > constructor and a reference to the Form is stored in the UFC class, > would it not be meanful to make it accessible by having a > const Form & form() const; > member function in the UFC class? >
Just pass the Form and don't use UFC. The UFC class is just a convenience class for assembly, and shouldn't generally be used. The less that is in UFC, the easy things are to maintain (as I know from having made some recent changes). Garth > -- > Andre > > > > >> >> Garth >> >>> Kind regards, >>> Andre >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
