On Wednesday February 23 2011 10:35:05 Anders Logg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 10:26:24AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Wednesday February 23 2011 09:08:26 Anders Logg wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 05:03:41PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > On 23/02/11 16:59, Anders Logg wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 04:40:09PM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > > > > >> On 23/02/11 16:35, Anders Logg wrote: > > > > >>> Is it time to stop pushing so we don't make any last minute > > > > >>> breaking before the release? > > > > >> > > > > >> I can stop - the pushes were somewhat related to a bug fix. > > > > > > > > > > Great! If you feel the urge to push, you can always push to > > > > > ~dolfin-core/dolfin/wells. ;-) > > > > > > > > > > Did you just restart the buildbots? I was going to. Anyway, let's > > > > > wait until they are green and then make the release. > > > > > > > > > > I can do the other releases in the meantime. Which packages need > > > > > release? > > > > > > > > > > FFC 0.9.5 > > > > > UFC 2.0.0 > > > > > UFL 0.6.0 (or 1.0?) > > > > > Viper 0.6.0 (or 1.0?) > > > > > Instant 0.9.9 (or 1.0?) > > > > > > > > > > Since we are releasing DOLFIN 1.0 shortly, it might also be good to > > > > > bump the version numbers of some of the other packages. It would be > > > > > good to get some comments from the main authors of UFL, Viper, > > > > > Instant. > > > > > > > > > > The main plan could then be to only make new releases of DOLFIN and > > > > > (maybe) FFC in a month. The other packages have then already be > > > > > released so we don't need to bother with those (unless we make bug > > > > > fix releases). > > > > > > > > Instant needs a critical fix to allow the calling program to pass the > > > > SWIG executable, so I wouldn't bump it to 1.0. > > > > Agree. > > > > > > There are a few other significant issues that may requires changes to > > > > various packages, so let's not bump any version numbers just yet. > > > > > > ok, except for UFC then. > > > > > > How about bumping to 0.9.9 (for FFC, FIAT, Viper, UFL)? > > > > I suggest bumping just one pointversion. Why should we bump all to 0.9.9? > > To indicate that 1.0 is near.
No strong feelings but it really does not make sense to me. > FFC will be 0.9.9. Not 0.9.5? ;) Johan > Then 1.0 will be released alongside DOLFIN 1.0. > -- > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
