On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:22:23AM +0100, Marie E. Rognes wrote: > On 02/22/2011 08:35 PM, Anders Logg wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 11:32:07AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >> > >> > >>On 22/02/11 11:07, Anders Logg wrote: > >>>On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 08:52:55AM +0000, Garth N. Wells wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>On 22/02/11 07:51, Anders Logg wrote: > >>>>>I'd like to implement this blueprint for 0.9.10: > >>>>> > >>>>>https://blueprints.launchpad.net/dolfin/+spec/attach-subdomains-to-form > >>>>> > >>>>>In addition, I'd like to remove the cell_domains, > >>>>>exterior_facet_domains and interior_facet_domains arguments from the > >>>>>assembler. It seems overkill to have three different ways to specify > >>>>>the domains and the logic becomes complex for handling which data > >>>>>overrides if many are specified. We could also remove these arguments > >>>>>from VariationalProblem. > >>>>> > >>>>>We would then have two ways to specify the subdomains: > >>>>> > >>>>>1. As part of the Mesh (MeshData) > >>>>> > >>>>>2. As part of the form > >>>>> > >>>>>The SystemAssembler would then need to rely on (1). > >>>>> > >>>>>Comments and objections? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>What's the advantage of having two methods? Why not just have one? > >>> > >>>It's natural to specify the subdomains as part of the mesh, but it's > >>>also natural to specify them as part of the form if one has say a and > >>>L and they should be assembled on the same mesh but partition the > >>>domain differently into subdomains. > >>> > >> > >>OK. > > > >I will implement this then. > > > > Looking forward to this... Is there an ETA ;-) ?
Yes: https://launchpad.net/dolfin/+milestone/0.9.11 -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
