On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 10:01:02PM -0700, Johan Hake wrote: > On Friday April 8 2011 03:31:00 Anders Logg wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:26:24AM +0200, Neilen Marais wrote: > > > Hi Anders, > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Anders Logg <l...@simula.no> wrote: > > > >> I agree with Johan and Evan here. If a scanned signature is good > > > >> enough (and I think it is), there's no reason we should require that > > > >> the international snail mail system be involved. > > > > > > > > I don't see that putting it in the mailbox is that much more of a > > > > hassle than scanning. For example, I own a printer but not a scanner > > > > so snaimail is easier for me. I understand if someone has a scanner on > > > > their desk then it's easier, but it's a small effort. > > > > > > I guess it's down to personal preference, but I for one definitely > > > prefer scanning and emailing! In any case, I will get down to signing > > > the form. Just to clarify, can I scan+email, or must I snailmail it? > > > > Please snailmail. Everyone else has done so: > > Is it only me or is this a terrible argument?
I think it's a good argument. We all agreed to collect the physical forms before starting to collect them. Many people have made a (relatively small) effort to submit the forms. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
