On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 02:20:44PM +0200, Marie E. Rognes wrote: > > Is the plan for 1.0-beta to fix > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ffc/+bug/787010 > > and then release?
Yes + decide on the interface for NonlinearVariationalProblem. I think that should be all. It would be good to hear more comments on the two suggestions: 1. (current) NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, rhs, u, bcs, [J]) This is consistent with LinearVariationalProblem and the solve() functions; same order of arguments. 2. (Garth) NonlinearVariationalProblen(lhs, u, bcs, [J]) This removes the unnecessary rhs argument which always has to be zero. I think there are good arguments for both but not very strong so it's a matter of taste. I'll try to fix bug 787010 now. I'm on vacation so I'm working slower than usual. -- Anders _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
