On 14 November 2011 10:26, Marie E. Rognes <m...@simula.no> wrote: > On 11/14/2011 11:13 AM, Garth N. Wells wrote: >> >> I frequently break the adaptivity unit test (my fault), but the tests >> are not very useful in tracking down problems because they're really >> regression tests rather than unit tests. Could they be broken up to >> better test individual function calls? >> > > If anyone sees a good way of doing that, yes, definitely! However, the error > estimation features are fairly high-level by construction, so further > (meaningful) simplifications are not entirely obvious. >
The test don't have to meaningful - it would be helpful in the case of a seg fault if we could narrow it down to a particular function call. It would be a help just to know which function calls are successful and which fail. > How about moving the adaptivity tests to the regression tests instead, so > that the regression tests include the demos + an additional set of tests? > Would that help? > I think that some low-level tests would be helpful. Garth > -- > Marie > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
