On Friday November 18 2011 02:29:18 Anders Logg wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 11:02:30AM -0800, Johan Hake wrote: > > On Thursday November 17 2011 10:55:34 Anders Logg wrote: > > > Would it be a good idea to implement our own assert (dolfin_assert) > > > which would use an #ifdef to stay out of place when not building with > > > the DEBUG flag enabled. > > > > > > The point would be for it to call dolfin_error instead of just > > > segfaulting. That way it's very easy to see where it comes from since > > > it will generate a trace in Python. > > > > > > I'm debugging some unit tests now which give > > > > > > ......python: > > > /home/logg/scratch/src/dolfin/1.0.x-logg/dolfin/la/EpetraVector.cpp:306 > > > : virtual void dolfin::EpetraVector::get_local(dolfin::Array<double>&) > > > const: Assertion `x' failed. > > > > > > and I have no idea from which test this comes from. > > > > > > We had our own assert before bug decided to use the standard C++ > > > assert. > > > > > > Any objections to me adding a dolfin_assert and replacing all asserts? > > > > That would be great! > > In progress... dolfinreplace works great! :-)
:) Would be cool if we could apply some regexp to that script too! Johan > -- > Anders > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~dolfin Post to : dolfin@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~dolfin More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
